Advertisement
✦ Calendar Converter & Comparison ✦

Lunisolar · Hijri · Gregorian

A lunar calendar that keeps its months fixed to the seasons by inserting an intercalary month (“Nasi’”) following the Metonic cycle — calibrated to the eclipse of 27 January 632 CE and computed with real astronomical algorithms (conjunction + solar longitude).

Choose a Gregorian date
⟡ The Nasi’ month was inserted to keep the calendar aligned with its seasons
Comparison with other calendars
Astronomical Hijri (month begins at conjunction)
Lunar months since the 632 CE eclipse
Year-number gap vs. the Hijri calendar
Next month's crescent at your location
Months of the year
#MonthStarts (Gregorian)Season
✦ How this calendar was built ✦

Scientific Methodology

Core idea

This is a lunisolar calendar, like the Hebrew and Chinese calendars: its months follow the Moon (one month from conjunction to conjunction), but a leap month is periodically inserted so each month stays fixed to its season. This differs from the Hijri calendar, which is purely lunar — its months drift through the seasons.

1 — The astronomical anchor

The calendar is calibrated to a certain astronomical event: the eclipse of 27 January 632 CE (“Muhammad’s eclipse”), which occurred at the death of Ibrahim, the Prophet’s son (pbuh). A solar eclipse can only occur at conjunction, so it is a precisely defined conjunction point per NASA’s computations. The calculation places it in late Shawwal, 10 AH, matching the historical sources.

2 — The time unit

The mean synodic month (conjunction to conjunction):

29.530588853 days

Each conjunction instant is actually computed with Meeus’ algorithm (Chapter 49), accurate to under one minute even back to the 7th century CE.

3 — Locking the months to the seasons

The year begins at the conjunction nearest the moment the Sun reaches the same ecliptic longitude it had at 1 Muharram 1 AH. The Sun’s position is computed with Meeus’ algorithm (Chapter 25), keeping the new year tied to a fixed season.

4 — Intercalation via the Metonic cycle

It rests on the astronomical fact:

19 solar years ≈ 235 lunar months
  • 19 × 12 = 228 ordinary months, but the reality is 235 — an excess of 7 months.
  • These seven months (“Nasi’”) are inserted, distributed across every 19 years.
  • The logic uses no fixed table; it counts actual conjunctions: if a year spans 13 conjunctions it is a leap year.
  • The resulting seasonal drift is under two days every 19 years.

5 — The two crescent-impossibility thresholds

Only impossibility is judged (never possibility) at sunset at the visitor’s location:

  • Time threshold: crescent age < 15 hours after conjunction.
  • Danjon limit: elongation (Sun–Moon angle) < 7°.

The Sun and Moon positions and the sunset instant are computed astronomically for the visitor’s coordinates. Passing both thresholds does not imply visibility — that depends on the horizon, atmosphere, and eyesight.

References

  • NASA / Fred Espenak — eclipse catalogue and lunar phases.
  • U.S. Naval Observatory — lunar phase timings.
  • Jean Meeus — “Astronomical Algorithms” (conjunction & Sun algorithms).
  • Yallop & Odeh criteria and the ICOP project — crescent-visibility models.
Religious & historical note: “Nasi’” (inserting a leap month) was the practice of pre-Islamic Arabia, and Islam explicitly abolished it (the Qur’an, 9:37, calls it “an increase in disbelief”). The adopted Hijri calendar is purely lunar with no intercalation. This calendar is a computational–astronomical tool for comparison and study, not a religious calendar.

On the nature and purpose of this tool

We offer this tool as an aid to enthusiasts, students, and researchers in astronomy, calendars, and history — a means of exploration and of comparing calendars and understanding the relationship between astronomical and historical events.

It is not a substitute for any adopted calendar, carries no religious authority for acts of worship such as fasting, Hajj, or festivals, and holds no official academic standing to be cited like peer-reviewed sources. Worship timings are determined by the competent religious authorities and recognised crescent sighting; scholarly research refers to its primary sources.

What this tool provides is an independent, verifiable astronomical computation — to be consulted, not invoked as proof, and corrected whenever an error is shown.

Advertisement